Wednesday, April 12, 2017

New Issue: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht

The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 77, no. 1, 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War
    • A. Peters & C. Marxsen, Editors’ Introduction: Self-Defence in Times of Transition
    • O. Corten, Has Practice Led to an “Agreement Between the Parties” Regarding the Interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter?
    • T. Christakis, Challenging the “Unwilling or Unable” Test
    • I. Österdahl, Scarcely Reconcilable with the UN Charter
    • S. Kawagishi, Clearing Uncertainties of the Jurisprudence of the ICJ on Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors
    • P. Urs, Effective Territorial Control by Non-State Armed Groups and the Right of Self-Defence
    • L. Lo Giacco, Reconsidering the Legal Basis for Military Actions Against Non-State Actors
    • B. Sjöstedt, Applying the Unable/Unwilling State Doctrine – Can a State Be Unable to Take Action?
    • M. Hartwig, Which State’s Territory May Be Used for Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors?
    • J.A. Frowein, Article 51 and the Realities of the Present Day World
    • K. Oellers-Frahm, Article 51 – What Matters Is the Armed Attack, not the Attacker
    • I. Couzigou, The Right to Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors – Criteria of the “Unwilling or Unable” Test
    • G. Keinan, Humanising the Right of Self-Defence
    • C.J. Tams, Embracing the Uncertainty of Old: Armed Attacks by Non-State Actors Prior to 9/11
    • L. van den Herik, “Proceduralising” Article 51
    • A. Tancredi, Doctrinal Alternatives to Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors
    • M. Wood, Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors – A Practitioner’s View
    • L. Grover, Intertemporality and Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors
    • C.-P. Sassenrath, Diverging Interpretations of Individual State Practice on Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors – Considerations for a Methodological Approach
    • P. Starski, A Call for a Turn to the Meta-Level of International Law: Silence, the “Interregnum”, and the Conundrum of Ius Cogens
    • C. Marxsen, A Note on Indeterminacy of the Law on Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors
  • Abhandlungen
    • B. Kempen & B. Schiffbauer, Die vorläufige Anwendung völkerrechtlicher Verträge im internationalen Mehrebenensystem
    • F. Capone, From the Justice and Peace Law to the Revised Peace Agreement Between the Colombian Government and the FARC: Will Victims’ Rights Be Satisfied at Last?
    • B. Gogarty & P. Lawrence, The ICJ Whaling Case: Missed Opportunity to Advance the Rule of Law in Resolving Science-Related Disputes in Global Commons?
    • S. Dellavalle, Law as a Linguistic Instrument Without Truth Content? On the Epistemology of Koskenniemi’s Understanding of Law
    • A. Vincze, Europäisierung des nationalen Verwaltungsrechts – eine rechtsvergleichende Annäherung