Monday, June 13, 2016

Fitzmaurice & Tamada: Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment

Malgosia Fitzmaurice (Queen Mary, Univ. of London - Law) & Dai Tamada (Kobe Univ. - Law) have published Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment (Brill | Nijhoff 2016). Contents include:
  • Malgosia Fitzmaurice & Dai Tamada, Introduction
  • Caroline E. Foster, Methodologies and Motivations: Was Japan’s Whaling Programme for Purposes of Scientific Research?
  • Shotaro Hamamoto, From the Requirement of Reasonableness to a ‘Comply and Explain’ Rule: The Standard of Review in the Whaling Judgment
  • Malgosia Fitzmaurice, The Whaling Convention and Thorny Issues of Interpretation
  • Theodore Christakis, The ‘Margin of Appreciation’ in the Use of Exemptions in International Law: Comparing the ICJ Whaling Judgment and the Case Law of the ECtHR
  • Dai Tamada, Unfavourable but Unavoidable Procedures: Procedural Aspects of the Whaling Case
  • Christian J. Tams, Roads Not Taken, Opportunities Missed: Procedural and Jurisdictional Questions Sidestepped in the Whaling Judgment
  • Mika Hayashi, The Whaling Judgment and the Challenges of Dynamic Treaty Regimes
  • Joji Morishita, IWC and the ICJ Judgment
  • Donald R. Rothwell, The Whaling Case: An Australian Perspective
  • Hironobu Sakai, After the Whaling in the Antarctic Judgment: Its Lessons and Prospects from a Japanese Perspective
  • Anthony Press, Science in the Court! The Role of Science in ‘Whaling in the Antarctic’
  • Akiho Shibata, Conclusion: The Judgment, Its Implications and Prospects